Category: International

  • Cremele de protecție solară și siguranța pe timp de vară

    Cremele de protecție solară și siguranța pe timp de vară

    As well as avoiding direct sunlight and wearing protective clothing such as hats, long-sleeved shirts and pants, effective sunscreen products have been available for years. But as genuine concerns about product safety mix with myths and falsehoods on social media and elsewhere online, some people may move away from these cancer-preventing products.

    “The most important thing that I always want to emphasize in any of the research I’m doing is the importance of using [sunscreen],” said Richard Blackburn, a materials scientist at the University of Leeds and Keracol Limited, UK, who researches and develops new sunscreens and skin products.

    “We should be worried about skin, skin damage, DNA damage, skin aging, so the use of a sunscreen, if you’re going to be out, is really, really important.”

    Ultraviolet light damages skin

    Ultraviolet (UV) light is emitted by the sun, penetrates Earth’s atmosphere and reaches the surface. And it’s dangerous.

    “UV damages all living things,” said Antony Young, a photobiologist at Kings College London.

    UV is invisible but the damage it causes to humans when it’s absorbed by the skin is obvious. Even a short-term exposure to sunlight — sometimes less than half an hour — can cause sunburn.

    There are two types of UV light: UVA and UVB.

    UVA is a longer wavelength form of ultraviolet and reaches deep layers of the skin. UVB usually penetrates the outer skin layers, such as the epidermis, and is the main cause of sunburn.

    Even people with darker skin tones need to be careful of UV. While natural pigmentation can provide a temporary guard against ultraviolet light, skin is skin, and damage can still occur after extensive exposure.

    While high-SPF sunscreens filter out most UV light, health advocates recommend covering as much of the body as possible when exposed to direct sunImage: Jordi Boixareu/ZUMA Wire/IMAGO

    There are two types of sunscreens

    In the 20th century, sunscreens were developed to reduce the harm caused by UV. They contain many ingredients but are generally divided into two categories based on their active properties.

    One of these are “chemical” sunscreens. But scientists are trying to move away from that description because, after all, everything on our planet is made of chemicals.

    The term they prefer is “organic sunscreen” because they contain carbon-based active ingredients. These molecules absorb and diminish UV rays when they hit the skin, helping to prevent sunburn.

    The other category is sometimes called “physical” or “natural” sunscreens. The active ingredients in these are chemicals too — but they aren’t carbon-based. Instead, these use titanium or zinc oxide particles to provide a physical filter. 

    Both sunscreens absorb and block UV from penetrating and damaging skin. The radiation is released as heat.

    While no sunscreen filters out 100% of UV, they are vital at blocking out an overwhelming amount of it. Sunscreens are rated using protective factor labels, abbreviated to SPF or UPF, indicating how much UV is filtered out. 

    SPF15, for example, filters away 93% of UVB radiation; SPF30 filters 97% and SPF50 filters 98%.

    Skin cancer and the dangers of the sun

    To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

    Sunscreen having a moment in the spotlight

    Health authorities are increasingly vocal about the importance of using sunscreen, and general sun protection, to prevent skin damage and reduce skin cancer rates.

    But these messages are also competing with claims, including ones circulated on social media, that sunscreen can do more harm than good. Some of these are falsehoods misrepresenting data.

    There are, however, also reasonable concerns about the safety profile of some chemicals that have been used in sunscreen for years. While these have generally been considered safe, some long-approved substances like oxybenzone, avobenzone and octinoxate have been detected in the bloodstream, and may break down into toxic compounds.

    The question scientists — and health regulators — are asking is, are these toxins enough to pose a danger?

    Vezi toate știrile de pe cremele protecție solară

    “What matters is the dose,” said Young. “This is also true with concerns about sunscreen pollution into the oceans. The trouble is a lot of the toxicity studies are done with doses that are not going to be achieved, or [are] very difficult to achieve.”

    Among other recommendations from dermatologists and researchers are for consumers to pay attention to expiry dates, storage conditions and to avoid mixing different sunscreens at the same time. That includes cosmetics that have an SPF rating. 

    Blackburn’s research has shown applying two different types of sunscreen products can diminish their protective benefits.

    “We found it actually can reverse the whole process by combining those [different sunscreens] together, and that’s very counterintuitive,” he said. “You would almost think you’re layering and layering and you get better [protection], It’s not the case.”

    Do-it-yourself sunscreens are risky

    Then there’s so-called natural sunscreens that swap out certain lab-made molecules for naturally derived ingredients.

    Rendered beef fat, commonly called tallow, has been marketed as one such product, while some homemade recipes and online blogs point to naturally derived oils and even certain supplements to provide protection.

    But the SPF of these ingredients is usually negligible. Products marketed as “natural” will usually contain chemicals like zinc or titanium oxide to provide adequate protection.

    Young warns against do-it-yourself sunscreens.

    “The thing about these homemade efforts is that you can’t test them. Formulating a sunscreen is quite a technically tricky job to get it both cosmetically appealing, stable and also protective,” he said.

    (F)actually healthy: Sun protection

    To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

    Future of sunscreen could be plant-based

    While most sunscreen chemicals, whether skin-absorbed carbon compounds or physical protectors like zinc are the current gold standard for SPF, scientists are finding new chemicals in nature. 

    Like many pharmaceuticals, chemical compounds evolved by plants, fungi and other animals could be harnessed to provide health benefits.

    “There are natural chemicals that have the potential to be protective,” said Young. “And plants in particular produce chemicals to protect their DNA.” 

    Labs like those run by Blackburn are trying to identify, isolate and produce such chemical compounds for use in sunscreens. It could reduce the reliance on lab synthesized chemicals in future sunscreens, though in places like the US, these would still need regulatory approval.

    “Everything is chemistry,” said Blackburn. “If we can understand from a chemical level and a mechanistic perspective what’s working, we can actually improve [sunscreen], look to… plants that can provide the same function.”

    Edited by: Carla Bleiker

    Matthew Ward Agius Journalist reporting on politics, health, history, science, climate and environment.Send us your feedback


    Sursa: DW

  • Cum se adaptează companiile în contextul prăbușirii politicii Franței privind Africa?

    Cum se adaptează companiile în contextul prăbușirii politicii Franței privind Africa?

    The term refers to a complex and controversial network of political, economic, social and military ties between France and its former African colonies, describing a kind of special relationship characterized by ongoing French influence in these nations.

    Often described as neocolonial, France’s Africa policy is under massive political and popular pressure, and the fight against it is openly challenging Paris’ military, diplomatic and economic footprint in Africa.

    The Sahel region stretches from the Sahara Desert in the north to the savannas in the south, encompassing several countries, including Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso, Mauritania and Chad.

    France grapples with waning influence in West Africa

    To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

    Antoine Glaser is a French journalist and former director of Paris-based magazine Africa Intelligence — a leading publication focused on Africa with editions in English and French.

    He said French companies with operations in the region enjoyed “preferential treatment,” especially during the Cold War era due to the Francafrique policy.

    “They thought they were at home in Africa,” he told DW, and ignored more recent realities such as the fact that Africa has “gone global and France didn’t see China coming.”

    One such stark reality, he added, is Chinese companies now have a 25% market share in French-speaking Africa, while France’s share has tumbled to “between 6% and 7%.”

    Moreover, French multinational nuclear fuel cycle corporation Orano announced last September that it would suspend production at its Arlit uranium mine in northern Niger due to financial difficulties faced by its Nigerien subsidiary, Somair.

    The decision came as border closures between Niger and Benin, triggered by the July 2023 coup, had blocked all uranium exports, Orano said in a statement, adding: “In spite of efforts to find alternative possibilities to export the uranium produced by Somair and to relaunch commercial activities, all the proposals made to the Nigerien authorities have remained unanswered.”

    The Arlit mine in Niger yields 7,000 tons of uranium, about 20% of world productionImage: Pierre Verdy/AFP

    In June 2024, Orano also lost its mining license for the Imouraren uranium deposit due to a decision by the military government, which revoked the license following a period of tensions and ultimatum.

    Situated about 160 kilometers (100 miles) from Agadez — the largest town in central Niger — the Imouraren mine holds one of the world’s largest uranium deposits. Mining was launched by French nuclear group Areva, rebranded as Orano in 2018, which mothballed the mine in 2015 due to unfavorable market conditions.

    Since then, tensions have illustrated the fragility of a system in which military and diplomatic presence supported economic interests. 

    Paris seeking new relationships

    Beyond the uranium sector, France’s whole model of influence is being destabilized, affecting sectors like infrastructure, telecommunication, energy and public works — all symbols of France’s presence that are now being regularly challenged.

    In July, the French military left its last base in Senegal and is now absent in west and central AfricaImage: Patrick Meinhardt/AFP/Getty Images

    In February 2023, French President Emmanuel Macron presented a new strategy, entitled “Our Future The Africa-France Partnership,” and offering new forms of partnerships.  

    Unveiled by Macron ahead of his tour of Central Africa, the strategy advocates abandoning old paradigms and puts a new emphasis on economic and trade relations rather than focusing on security issues. The central idea of this new model is based on a transition from “a logic of aid to a logic of solidarity investments and partnerships,” and is meant to be a “symbiotic relationship” beneficial to all parties.

    What France used to consider as its “backyard” for a long time is disappearing amid wider change in the Sahel region.

    In addition, Africa as a whole is no longer France’s exclusive business playground. Countries like Turkey, Russia, China and even Germany are advancing their positions, forcing French companies to readjust their business policy if they are to survive in an increasingly competitive environment. 

    President Emmanuel Macron is trying to put France’s relationship with Africa on a new footingImage: STEFANO RELLANDINI/AFP

    A French corporate consultant, speaking on condition of anonymity, told DW that in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger, the real French presence was “already marginal before recent tensions” with their colonial motherland. 

    Urmărește cele mai importante știri

    In the mining industry, he said, the main players are now often from Australia or Canada, like Toronto-based mining giant Barrick Mining Corporation. “The perception that France is omnipresent is stronger than the reality,” he said.  

    He also noted that behind “official posturing,” a strategy was becoming clearer: “Maintain a presence, but through more indirect means.”

    French companies would now seek to maintain market share “without provoking rejection” by launching joint ventures, local partnerships or the creation of project companies under local law.

    “There is now a dynamic in which these companies are adapting through cooperating more with local partners, setting up shared structures. It’s a way of staying active while avoiding head-on visibility,” he added.

    Competition growing in Africa

    Yves Ekoue Amaizo, the director at the Afrocentricity Think Tank, thinks the gradual withdrawal of French companies also opens the door to new alliances, because African countries would now have “the capacity and the partners to replace these companies.”

    “China, Turkey and other immediate players are already involved. But this means accepting new, often opaque conditions, and managing a context of risks [such as] political instability, terrorism and legal uncertainties,” he told DW.

    China has invested heavily in roads, bridges and other infrastructure across Africa in recent yearsImage: Han Xu/Xinhua News Agency/picture alliance

    While withdrawal seems inevitable for some French multinational corporations, others are still betting on rebalancing their business strategies.

    According to a report in the offshore industry magazine Offshore Technology, energy giant TotalEnergies, for example, is trying to find a new footing in English- and Portuguese-speaking countries, including Kenya, South Africa, Namibia and Angola.

    But competition there is fierce, and France can no longer rely on a historical advantage in these countries. Even more so as questions of legitimacy and social responsibility also play an increasing role, said Amaizo.

    “The real question is one of mentality. If companies want to remain credible, they must prove that they are co-constructing locally and sharing the benefits, rather than going it alone with the resources.” 

    With the era of the Francafrique special relationship between France and its former African colonies now coming to an end, there are signs that French multinationals are trying to transform themselves, too, by collaborating more strongly with local partners or moving operations elsewhere in Africa.

    No matter what they do or where they go, legitimacy remains their main capital and must be regained. 

    Edited by: Uwe Hessler


    Sursa: DW

  • Protestul împotriva unei nave de croazieră israeliene stârnește dezbateri în Grecia

    Protestul împotriva unei nave de croazieră israeliene stârnește dezbateri în Grecia

    His comments came in response to last Tuesday’s protests on the island of Syros, where around 300 demonstrators assembled at the island’s port carrying Palestinian flags and a large banner that said, “Stop the genocide.” They were there to meet the MS Crown Iris, a ship owned by the Israeli cruise line, Mano Maritime.

    The protest was organized by locals who wanted to show that it wasn’t acceptable to greet Israeli tourists while Palestinians in Gaza were starving, due to Israel’s blockade on aid entering the occupied territory.

    According to the World Health Organization, most of the 1.8 million people in Gaza are going hungryImage: Ali Jadallah/Anadolu/picture alliance

    Around 1,600 passengers were on the ship, which had set sail from Israel on Sunday. Some aboard reacted angrily to the portside protest, waving Israeli flags and even insulting the demonstrators, calling out “may your village burn,” a slogan popular with Israeli right-wing extremists.

    The cruise line ultimately decided the passengers shouldn’t disembark at Syros and continued on its journey to Cyprus.

    It’s not often this kind of thing happens in Greece, where there have been fewer pro-Palestinian demonstrations than in many other European countries.

    Dockworkers’ unions speak out against military shipments

    But every now and again, there has been some anti-Israel action in the seafaring EU nation.

    On July 16, dockworkers and activists tried to prevent the unloading of steel meant for military purposes in Israel. The activists said the cargo was transferred from one ship, the Ever Golden, to another, the Cosco Shipping Pisces, in an attempt to keep the cargo “under the radar.” The dockworkers’ union said that they wouldn’t allow the port to become a base for any military actions.

    There were similar protest actions in October 2024, and these are expected to continue.

    A pro-Palestinian demonstration was held in Athens’ main harbor, Piraeus, earlier this monthImage: Stelios Misinas/REUTERS

    Meanwhile, the episode on Syros has led to heated debate in Greece. Many locals say the protest was racist and some called the demonstrators “shameless fascists.” Others supported the demonstrators, saying the Israeli tourists should be informed of what their government doing in Gaza.

    Those who are firmly on Israel’s side have accused the others of antisemitism. This is despite the fact that among those Greeks are some right-wing extremists who are actually traditionally antisemitic themselves. Now, however, they admire Israel’s military strength and see Israel as an ally, mostly against Turkey, but also against Muslims in general, whom they accuse of trying to change the European way of life.

    The pro-Palestinian group is mostly left wing, who insist their criticism has nothing to do with antisemitism. In fact, they say that antisemitism is being worsened by Israeli actions in Gaza.

    Political opinions flavor support

    Opinion polls in Greece suggest that just under half of all locals are neutral about the conflict in Gaza. However, among the other half of the population, those who are not neutral, support for Israel has declined after almost two years of fighting in Gaza.

    In a survey by the Eteron Institute for Research and Social Change, conducted in late April, interviewees were asked who they most supported in the conflict. Just over 40% answered “neither side.” Of the rest, 30% favored the Palestinian side and 17.6% favored Israel. That’s a significant change from November 2023 — immediately after the Hamas-led attacks on Israel on October 7 — when 34% supported Israel.

    Further detailed results show that almost 50% of those Greeks who support the conservative ruling party, New Democracy, also support Israel. Those who prefer the far-right party, Voice of Reason, also support Israel.

    In May 2021, long before the events of October 2023, these protesters in Athens spoke out about Israel’s bombing of Gaza that yearImage: Angelos Tzortzinis/AFP/Getty Images

    Among those who support PASOK, a social democratic party, only 12% like Israel while 34% are pro-Palestinian. The rest of the PASOK supporters are neutral.

    Further left though, of the Greeks who support the local Communist party and other left-wing parties, between 74% and 84% are pro-Palestinian.

    Israel, Greece enjoy long-lasting alliance

    Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis, a member of New Democracy, supports Israel without reservation and has called Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu “his friend.” Mitsotakis actually visited Netanyahu in Israel even after the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for the Israeli leader’s arrest for crimes against humanity and war crimes.

    Citește mai multe știri pe top10stiri.ro

    In June 2025, when Israel was targeted by Iran, civilian Israeli airplanes were allowed to take shelter on Greek islands. Netanyahu’s own official plane was parked in Athens.

    For a long time, Greek Foreign Minister Giorgos Gerapetritis has been trying to maintain a more balanced stance, remaining in contact with Palestinian leadership and insisting on his support for a two-state solution.

    Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis (right) met with ‘his friend’ Benjamin Netanyahu on Cyprus in September 2024Image: Petros Karadjias/AFP

    Along with 28 other countries, including many European nations, Greece did sign the recent resolution calling on Israel to end the conflict in Gaza and fulfill its humanitarian obligations to the civilian population.

    Still, left-wing opposition politicians maintain their government’s position is wrong and issued a joint statement at the end of May, calling on the Greek government to end military cooperation with Israel.

    Close cooperation between Israel and Greece began long before Mitsotakis became prime minister. The alliance really became closer around 2008. This was solidified by a flurry of visits of heads of state in 2010 and ever since, there’s been strategic cooperation between the two nations.

    Before that time, relations were cooler. Athens was typically pro-Arab and Greece was the only European country to vote against the United Nations resolution of 1947 that effectively led to the founding of the state of Israel. This was due to Athens’ ties with the Arab world.

    Former Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou (left) hosted Netanyahu in 2010, marking the first time an Israeli prime minister had visited AthensImage: Aris Messinis/AFP

    Greece did de facto recognize Israel in 1949, but it wasn’t until May 1990 that then-Prime Minister Konstantinos Mitsotakis — the father of Greece’s current prime minister — officially recognized Israel and diplomatic relations were normalized. At the same time, Mitsotakis also promoted diplomatic relations with Palestinian leadership.

    Today, the relationship between the two countries is close, especially in terms of economic, energy and military cooperation.

    For Israelis, Greece remains an attractive vacation destination — if only because of its geographical proximity — and Greek food and music are very popular in Israel. Many Greek artists regularly perform in Israel. Most recently, popular singer Glykeria faced backlash after announcing she would perform there.

    This story was originally written in German.

    In Israel, frustration grows as hostages remain in captivity

    To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video

    Kaki Bali DW correspondent in AthensSend us your feedback


    Sursa: DW

  • Finala Euro 2025: Anglia a învins Spania și a câștigat din nou

    Finala Euro 2025: Anglia a învins Spania și a câștigat din nou

    Așa cum a făcut la Euro 2022, când a frânt inimile germanilor marcând în prelungiri pe Wembley, așa s-a întâmplat și în Elveția, când Kelly a marcat lovitura de pedeapsă care a păstrat trofeul pentru țara sa. Anterior, cele două echipe schimbaseră goluri cu capul de o parte și de alta a pauzei, Mariona Caldentey pentru Spania, Alessia Russo pentru Anglia.

    Chiar înainte de lovitura de pedeapsă, Kelly schimbase jocul, reușind centrarea lui Russo, iar încă o dată forța Angliei în joc a fost decisivă. Este prima dată când Anglia câștigă un turneu major în afara propriei țări. Totuși, lucrurile nu au fost deloc line, așa cum a făcut aluzie antrenoarea Sarina Wiegman după meci.

    Chloe Kelly a marcat golul victoriei la Euro 2022 și penalty-ul decisiv la Euro 2025, duminică. Imagine: Stefan Wermuth/REUTERS

    „Nu-mi vine să cred. Cuvântul „echipă” descrie cine suntem. Sunt atât de mândră de ei și de personal”, a declarat pentru BBC antrenoarea, care a câștigat și turneul din 2017 cu Olanda natală. „Am o medalie la gât și noi avem trofeul. A fost cel mai haotic turneu, din prima zi a fost haos. De la pierderea meciului de deschidere și până la câștigarea trofeului, incredibil.”

    Niciodată învinsă

    Pe lângă înfrângerea de deschidere în fața Franței, Anglia a trebuit să revină târziu împotriva Suediei și Italiei în sferturi și semifinale. De fapt, au condus doar cu patru minute și 52 de secunde în cele trei meciuri eliminatorii.

    „Să joci pentru această echipă a Angliei este incredibil. Nu ne poți doborî”, a concluzionat căpitanul Leah Williamson. „A face asta din nou este cel mai greu. Cât de mult s-a schimbat fotbalul feminin și pentru noi să o facem din nou. Miza, totul era mare. Am mizat pe noroc [dar] nu am avut noroc.”

    Anglia a trebuit să se confrunte și cu abuzurile rasiste la adresa fundașei Jess Carter pe rețelele de socializare după meciul cu Suedia. Echipa a răspuns prin a nu mai îngenunchea, un gest antirasist folosit pentru prima dată de fundașul echipei de fotbal american Colin Kapernick, care s-a răspândit în întreaga lume.

    „A îngenunchea nu e suficient. Facem asta de ceva vreme. Impactul nu e suficient de bun, nu e atât de mare pe cât credem”, a spus Wiegman.

    Revenirea lui Carter

    După ce a fost eliminat în victoria dramatică din semifinală împotriva Italiei, pecetluită de un gol al lui Kelly în minutul 119, Carter a revenit în finală și a excelat în timp ce Anglia s-a confruntat cu valurile de atacuri spaniole.

    „Pur și simplu nu aș putea fi mai mândru. Mă simt fără cuvinte”, a spus jucătorul lui Chelsea după meci. „Simt o ușurare, o emoție. Vreau să le mulțumesc enorm fanilor noștri, prietenilor și familiei mele. Pentru oricine s-a îndoit de noi, s-a îndoit de mine, asta [facem].”

    Citește mai multe știri pe top10stiri.ro

    Leoaicele, așa cum este cunoscută echipa feminină a Angliei, au susținut constant egalitatea și s-au bucurat de o prezență importantă încă de la turneul de acasă de acum trei ani. Această victorie a stimulat creșteri masive ale prezenței la meciurile din liga internă (WSL) și ale participării femeilor și fetelor la acest sport. Aceasta, plus investițiile Asociației Engleze de Fotbal din ultimul deceniu, au mutat Anglia de la mijlocul clasamentului la singura echipă care poate concura cu Spania.

    Victoria la Cupa Mondială, umbrită de sărutul lui Rubiales

    Cele două țări au câștigat acum ultimele trei trofee internaționale majore și ultimele trei titluri de Liga Campionilor (cea mai înaltă distincție la nivel de club din Europa), după ce Arsenal a învins Barcelona în finala din acest an.

    Dar pentru Spania, strălucirea tehnică a unei generații formate în mare parte din jucătoare ale Barcelonei, condusă de Aitana Bonmati, care a ratat o lovitură de departajare la loviturile de departajare, dar a câștigat premiul de jucătoare a turneului, și Alexia Putellas, a realizat atât de mult.

    Acest lucru se întâmplă în ciuda unei federații conduse până de curând de Luis Rubiales, al cărui sărut nedorit asupra jucătoarei Jenni Hermoso a devenit un paratrăznet global pentru problemele de consimțământ sexual și s-a încheiat cu găsirea sa vinovată de agresiune sexuală la începutul acestui an. Comportamentul lui Rubiales și al fostului antrenor Jorge Vilda a determinat deja mai multe jucătoare spaniole să boicoteze Cupa Mondială.

    Deși au ajuns acolo prin metode diferite, noua eră de dominație pentru Anglia și Spania s-ar putea dovedi problematică pentru restul fotbalului feminin, deoarece puteri europene mai tradiționale, precum Germania și Norvegia, nu își comercializează la fel de rapid echipele interne și internaționale. Dar puțini din Anglia vor păsa de acest lucru atunci când trofeul va fi paradat în fața Palatului Buckingham, marți.

    Editat de: Roshni Majumdar


    Sursa: DW